A New Approach to Contrastive Topic: Partition Semantics and Pragmatics
نویسنده
چکیده
The purpose of the current work is to propose a more comprehensive approach to Contrastive Topic (henceforth, CT) than the existing ones. In the literature, there have been two approaches to CT proposed: one is to take CT as an information-structural discourse-regulating notion on a par with focus and the other is to analyze CT as an focus-sensitive operator with its inherent semantic and pragmatic content. Although both of the approaches have their own merits capturing some facets of CT, neither of them is adequate, for one cannot capture the facets the other can and furthermore, as we will see, there are examples of CT neither of the approaches can be extended to deal with. Alternatively, we will propose an alternative approach couched in the so-called partition semantics of questions proposed by (Groenendijk & Stokhof 1984, Groenendijk 1999). 1 CT as an information-structural discourse-regulating notion on a par with focus Consider the question-answer discourse in (1). It is intuitively clear that CT as well as focus has something to do with the congruence of the discourse.
منابع مشابه
Contrastive Topic/focus and Polarity in Discourse
The information structure categories of Contrastive Topic and Contrastive Focus are examined to see their crucial roles in polarity and (conventional) implicature generation and implicature suspension and their respective correlatins with PA and SN conjunctions on one hand and descriptive (denotational) negation and metalinguistic negation on the other. The underlying notion of concessivity inv...
متن کاملContrast and Implication in Natural Language
In this paper we introduce a theoretical framework and a logical application for analyzing the semantics and pragmatics of contrastive conjunctions in natural language. It is shown how expressions like although, nevertheless, yet and but are semantically definable as connectives using an operator for implication in natural language and how similar pragmatic principles affect the behaviour of bo...
متن کاملTopic Abstraction as the Source for Nested Alternatives: A Conservative Semantics for Contrastive Topic
In this paper, I argue for a new semantics for contrastive topic (CT) constructions that relies on a TOPIC ABSTRACTION operator to generate nested alternative structures. Compared to previous accounts like Büring 2003, my proposal is conservative in that it neither appeals to a new type of F-marking (cf. Büring’s CT-marks) nor stipulates any discourse conditions particular to the CT constructio...
متن کاملTowards a Contrastive Pragmatic Analysis of Congratulation Speech Act in Persian and English
This paper aims at studying the speech act of congratulation in Persian and English with regard to semantic formulas. To gather the semantic formulas related to congratulation, the researchers chose 100 movies (50 in Persian and 50 in English) as the instrument of the study. The only model of cross-cultural comparison was related to that of Elwood (2004). Therefore, we used Elwood’s model as th...
متن کاملA Contrastive Study of Request Speech Act in English and Persian Novels: Natural Semantic Metalanguage Approach
The Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) Approach claims that there are some universalities in all languages. Speech acts seem to be present in all languages, but considering this approach, research has not indicated whether request speech act differs from one language to another. Thus, this study intended to investigate whether request strategies are used differently in English and Persian roma...
متن کامل